I have been approached by 'a concerned CFer' about the
stories published on #ThingsElliottSays about Sarah Jane Sewell. Personally I think this news
story has run its course but if people want to come to me and state their
opinion on Sarah Jane standing for CF chair they can do. If I am able to offer a platform of free speech then I personally think its wrong to deny people that. 'A concerned CFer' asked
for an interview from me and this is his response.
Concerned about Sarah Jane. |
Q) How much
experience have you had with CF?
A) I joined in
March 2011. Campaigned in the County Council elections and 2 by elections.
Q) What did
you think of the CF elections?
A) The
campaign ads were putrid. For those who continue in pursuit this agenda of campaign
ads and coups they need to get a grip. I joined on the premise of what John Major
said "the
Conservative party is a family. it is a broad open and welcoming family." People
should be more focused on unity and achieving progress locally not sit back and
complain, acting immaturely because they didn't get their way. The debates were
good but was surprised that there were no debates South of London.
Q) What do
you think of the behaviour of certain people on the national executive?
A) After national
elections I assumed that everyone would settle their differences and start implementing
their manifesto pledges to benefit CF members. The very point of why they're
elected in the first place. But this hasn't taken place with some executive
members. What annoys me even more is national exec members are not getting
about around the country. P.S London and party conference does not count!
Q) What do
you think of Sarah Jane Sewell in general before she announced she will stand
as chair?
A) I was
sceptical. I voted SJS and have heard nothing of her progress. Once she was
elected she should have been professional and worked with whoever got elected, like
them or not. Sarah Jane should have settled her differences and worked with the
national executive to achieve something otherwise it's a waste of time members
who expect this and also expect those who hold national posts to do this and
get around the country.
Q) What do
you think to me releasing SJ's text which she sent to around 30 CFers?
A) You have
reported something which has CF interest. It's annoying that these stories
appear but the frustration lies with professional people who end up creating these
stories. You're just the messenger.
Q) Will you
be backing an SJ leadership bid?
A) HELL NO.
This is for 3 reasons. Firstly, People need to focus on what they can do with
the current incumbent. Secondly, the current incumbent has a lot of support.
Lastly, You shouldn't be complaining about the CF chair if you're not getting
about and around the country.
Q) Want do
you think it is best for Sarah Jane to do now?
A) She
should apologise on the issue of standing for CF Chair. I wouldn't stand
against Oliver Cooper. I 100% back the incumbent because of what he has done
for my area. But I'm not for or against any individual person.
Q) Will this
saga have a real effect on CF?
A) No, it shouldn't
do.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-jane-sewell-for-consfuture-national-deputy-chairman-membership/endorsement-from-elliott-johnson-eastern-region-social-action-officer-fens-cf-an/543648505660276
ReplyDeleteAs you have well noted I did support SJ in her election this year. However she has sadly become a hindrance and not a help to CF. Very sad.
ReplyDeleteI'm the true 'A Concerned CFer'. Not this fake 'A Concerned CFer'.
ReplyDeleteI'm Spartacus!
ReplyDelete